Skip to main content

Stretch the dynamic range of the given 8-bit grayscale image using MATL...

What exactly the ROC curve can tell us or can be inferred?

 I wrote some codes to run a linear discriminant analysis based classification:

 

%%Construct a LDA classifier with selected features and ground truth information
LDAClassifierObject                     = ClassificationDiscriminant.fit(featureSelcted, groundTruthGroup, 'DiscrimType', 'linear');
LDAClassifierResubError                 = resubLoss(LDAClassifierObject);

Thus, I can get

Resubstitution Error of LDA (Training Error): 1.7391e-01
Resubstitution Accuracy of LDA: 82.61%
Confusion Matrix of LDA:
    14     3
     1     5

Then I run a ROC analysis for the LDA classifier:

% Predict resubstitution response of LDA classifier
[LDALabel, LDAScore]                     = resubPredict(LDAClassifierObject);

% Fit probabilities for scores (the groundTruthGroup contains lables either 'Good' or 'Bad')
[FPR, TPR, Thr, AUC, OPTROCPT]       = perfcurve(groundTruthGroup(:,1), LDAScore(:,1), 'Good');

I have got:

OPTROCPT =

      0.1250    0.8667

Therefore, we can get:

Accuracy of LDA after ROC analysis: 86.91%
Confusion Matrix of LDA after ROC analysis:
    13     1
     2     7
My questions are:
 
1. After ROC analysis we obtained a better accuracy, when we report the accuracy of the classifier, which value we should use? What exactly the ROC curve can tell us or can be inferred? Can we say after ROC analysis we found a better accuracy of the LDA classifier?
2. Why the ROC can produce a better accuracy for the classifier, but the original ClassificationDiscriminant.fit can't?
3. I have also done a cross validation for the LDA classifier, like
 
cvLDAClassifier                    = crossval(LDAClassifierObject, 'leaveout', 'on');
Then how to get the ROC analysis for the cross validation? 'resubPredict' method seems only accept 'discriminant object' as input, then how can we get the scores?
 
4. classperf function of Matlab is very handy to gather all the information of the classifier, like
 
%%Get the performance of the classifier
LDAClassifierPerformace                 = classperf(groundTruthGroup, resubPredict(LDAClassifierObject));
However, anyone knows how to gather these information such as accuracy, FPR, etc. for the cross validation results?
 
Thanks very much. I am really looking forward to see the reply to above questions.

 NOTE:-


Matlabsolutions.com provide latest MatLab Homework Help,MatLab Assignment Help , Finance Assignment Help for students, engineers and researchers in Multiple Branches like ECE, EEE, CSE, Mechanical, Civil with 100% output.Matlab Code for B.E, B.Tech,M.E,M.Tech, Ph.D. Scholars with 100% privacy guaranteed. Get MATLAB projects with source code for your learning and research.

1. You can report anything you like as long as you report an estimate obtained by cross-validation or using an independent test set. You can fine-tune a classifier on the training set, but then its accuracy measured on the same set is biased up.
 
2. Sure, you get a different accuracy by using a different threshold for assigning into the positive class.
 
3. All loss methods for classifiers return by default the classification error, not the mean squared error. This is stated in many places in the doc.
 
4. You have code in your post to obtain a ROC by from resubstitution predictions. Just replace resubPredict with kfoldPredict.
 
5. Any estimate of classification performance should be obtained using data not used for training. Otherwise the estimate is optimis


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

https://journals.worldnomads.com/scholarships/story/70330/Worldwide/Dat-shares-his-photos-from-Bhutan https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=441349916452722960&postID=9118208214656837886&page=2&token=1554200958385 https://todaysinspiration.blogspot.com/2016/08/lp-have-look-at-this-this-is-from.html?showComment=1554201056566#c578424769512920148 https://behaviorpsych.blogspot.com/p/goal-bank.html?showComment=1554201200695 https://billlumaye.blogspot.com/2012/10/tagg-romney-drops-by-bill-show.html?showComment=1550657710334#c7928008051819098612 http://blog.phdays.com/2014/07/review-of-waf-bypass-tasks.html?showComment=1554201301305#c6351671948289526101 http://www.readyshelby.org/blog/gifts-of-preparedness/#comment_form http://www.hanabilkova.svet-stranek.cz/nakup/ http://www.23hq.com/shailendrasingh/photo/21681053 http://blogs.stlawu.edu/jbpcultureandmedia/2013/11/18/blog-entry-10-guns-as-free-speech/comment-page-1443/#comment-198345 https://journals.worldnomads.com

What are some good alternatives to Simulink?

Matlabsolutions provide latest  MatLab Homework Help, MatLab Assignment Help  for students, engineers and researchers in Multiple Branches like ECE, EEE, CSE, Mechanical, Civil with 100% output.Matlab Code for B.E, B.Tech,M.E,M.Tech, Ph.D. Scholars with 100% privacy guaranteed. Get MATLAB projects with source code for your learning and research. SIMULINK is a visual programing environment specially for time transient simulations and ordinary differential equations. Depending on what you need there are plenty of Free, Libre and Open Source Software (FLOSS) available: Modelica language is the most viable alternative and in my opinion it is also a superior option to MathWorks SIMULINK. There are open source implementations  OpenModelica  and  JModelica . One of the main advantages with Modelica that you can code a multidimensional ordinary differential equation with algebraic discrete non-causal equations. With OpenModelica you may create a non-causal model right in the GUI and with

USING MACHINE LEARNING CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHMS FOR DETECTING SPAM AND NON-SPAM EMAILS

    ABSTRACT We know the increasing volume of unwanted volume of emails as spam. As per statistical analysis 40% of all messages are spam which about 15.4 billion email for every day and that cost web clients about $355 million every year. Spammers to use a few dubious techniques to defeat the filtering strategies like utilizing irregular sender addresses or potentially add irregular characters to the start or the finish of the message subject line. A particular calculation is at that point used to take in the order rules from these email messages. Machine learning has been contemplated and there are loads of calculations can be used in email filtering. To classify these mails as spam and non-spam mails implementation of machine learning algorithm  such as KNN, SVM, Bayesian classification  and ANN  to develop better filtering tool.   Contents ABSTRACT 2 1. INTRODUCTION 4 1.1 Objective : 5 2. Literature Review 5 2.1. Existing Machine learning technique. 6 2.2 Existing