Skip to main content

How to change x-axis ticks labels in stackedplot?

  h = stackedplot(rand(6,3));   I want to set x-axis ticks according to my own defined set i.e., instead of 1:6, I want to replace x-axisticks [1, 2,3 ,4,5,6] to ['A', 'S','T', 'AAA', 'BBB', 'ZZZ'] , by rotating it to 90 degree that is vertically insted of horizontally?     NOTE:- Matlabsolutions.com  provide latest  MatLab Homework Help, MatLab Assignment Help  ,  Finance Assignment Help  for students, engineers and researchers in Multiple Branches like ECE, EEE, CSE, Mechanical, Civil with 100% output.Matlab Code for B.E, B.Tech,M.E,M.Tech, Ph.D. Scholars with 100% privacy guaranteed. Get MATLAB projects with source code for your learning and research. There does not seem to be an easy way to set the  XTick  or  XTickLabel  of a  StackedLineChart  object (such as what's created by  stackedplot ):   data = rand(6,3); h = stackedplot(1:6,data); % try a couple of things, neither of which work try set(h,'XTick',1:6,'XTic

As predicted delayed outputs settle in NarX

 I applied my code to data simplenarx_dataset. To do this I performed the following steps:

1 - I have done autocorrelation and cross correlation peaks to see that gives us more information. ID = 1, FD = 1
2 - I have found H, where H = 5
3 - I have created the network and have evaluated the details. Although the purpose of this post is not to evaluate the details but understand why you see a delayed response when performing closeloop, but public details and code In case of emergency there is some other error: My code is as follows(I used 80 data for training the network and 20 to check with closeloop):
p=p';
t=t';
p1=p(1:1,1:80);
p2=p(1:1,81:end);
t1=t(1,1:80);
t2=t(1,81:end);
inputSeries = tonndata(p1,true,false);
targetSeries = tonndata(t1,true,false);
inputDelays = 1:1;
feedbackDelays = 1:1;
hiddenLayerSize = 5;
net = narxnet(inputDelays,feedbackDelays,hiddenLayerSize);
[inputs,inputStates,layerStates,targets] = preparets(net,inputSeries,{},targetSeries);
net.divideFcn='divideblock';
net.divideParam.trainRatio=0.70;
net.divideParam.valRatio=0.15;
net.divideParam.testRatio=0.15;
[I N]=size(p1);
[O N]=size(t1);
N=N-1;
Neq=N*O;
ID=1;
FD=1;
Nw = (ID*I+FD*O+1)*hiddenLayerSize+(hiddenLayerSize+1)*O;
Ntrneq = N -2*round(0.15*N);
Ndof=Ntrneq-Nw;
ttotal=t1(1,1:N);
MSE00=mean(var(ttotal,1));
MSE00a=mean(var(ttotal,0));
t3=t(1,1:N);
[trainInd,valInd,testInd] = divideblock(t3,0.7,0.15,0.15);
MSEtrn00=mean(var(trainInd,1));
MSEtrn00a=mean(var(trainInd,0));
MSEval00=mean(var(valInd,1));
MSEtst00=mean(var(testInd,1));
net.trainParam.goal = 0.01*Ndof*MSEtrn00a/Ntrneq;
[net,tr,Ys,Es,Xf,Af] = train(net,inputs,targets,inputStates,layerStates);
outputs = net(inputs,inputStates,layerStates);
errors = gsubtract(targets,outputs);
MSE = perform(net,targets,outputs);
MSEa=Neq*MSE/(Neq-Nw);
R2=1-MSE/MSE00;
R2a=1-MSEa/MSE00a;
MSEtrn=tr.perf(end);
MSEval=tr.vperf(end);
MSEtst=tr.tperf(end);
R2trn=1-MSEtrn/MSEtrn00;
R2trna=1-MSEtrn/MSEtrn00a;
R2val=1-MSEval/MSEval00;
R2tst=1-MSEtst/MSEtst00;
and my results are:
ID=1
FD=1
H=5
N=79
Ndof=34
Neq=79
Ntrneq=55
Nw=21
O=1
I=1
R2=0.8036
R2a=0.7347
R2trn=0.8763
R2trna=0.8786
R2val=0.7862
R2tst=0.7541
As I mentioned earlier, I will not focus much on the accuracy in the answer but later will. The code I applied for closeloop was:
netc = closeloop(net);
netc.name = [net.name ' - Closed Loop'];
view(netc)
NumberOfPredictions = 15;
s=cell2mat(inputSeries);
t4=cell2mat(targetSeries);
a=s(1:1,79:80);
b=p2(1:1,1:15);
newInputSeries=[a b];
c=t4(1,80);
d=nan(1,16);
newTargetSet=[c d];
newInputSeries=tonndata(newInputSeries,true,false);
newTargetSet=tonndata(newTargetSet,true,false);
[xc,xic,aic,tc] = preparets(netc,newInputSeries,{},newTargetSet);
yPredicted = sim(netc,xc,xic,aic);
w=cell2mat(yPredicted);
plot(cell2mat(yPredicted),'DisplayName','cell2mat(yPredicted)','YdataS
ource','cell2mat(yPredicted)');figure(gcf)
plot(t2,'r','DisplayName','targetsComprobacion')
hold on
plot(w,'b','DisplayName','salidasIteradas')
title({'ITERACCIONES'})
legend('show')
hold off
and the result was the chart that you have indicated the link below where you will see it:
http://www.subirimagenes.com/otros-simenarx-8376264.html
In this picture we see the blue line (line outputs predicted) lags behind the red line (real targets). I'd like to know how I can do to get that blue line is in front of the red line, that is one step get out early. As I said, in this post I want to focus on why this happens and how I can fix it.



ANSWER



Matlabsolutions.com provide latest MatLab Homework Help,MatLab Assignment Help for students, engineers and researchers in Multiple Branches like ECE, EEE, CSE, Mechanical, Civil with 100% output.Matlab Code for B.E, B.Tech,M.E,M.Tech, Ph.D. Scholars with 100% privacy guaranteed. Get MATLAB projects with source code for your learning and research.

% 1. Selected ending semicolons can be removed to aid debugging
 
 
 [P, T ] = simplenarx_dataset;
 whos
 p= cell2mat(P);
 t = cell2mat(T);

 ID = 1:1
 FD = 1:1
 H = 5

 NID= length(ID)
 NFD=length(FD)
 Nw = (NID*I+NFD*O+1)*H+(H+1)*O
% 2. Use NID and NFD for Nw in case delays are not single
% 3. No need to use tonndata because the simplenarx_data set is instantly ready for preparets.
% 4. No need for (p1,t1) and (p2,t2). Delete both.
% 5. Input delays are suboptimal. Did you try to find the significant lags of the target/input cross-correlation function?
% 6. Feedback delays are suboptimal. Did you try to find the significant lags of the target autocorrelation function?
% 7. H is suboptimal. Was it chosen using the suboptimal delays? If so, please explain how.
 rng(0)
 net = narxnet(ID,FD,H);
 [inputs,inputStates,layerStates,targets] = preparets(net,P,{},T);
 whos P T inputs inputStates layerStates targets
%8. N=N-1: DELETE. NOT A GOOD IDEA TO USE A VARIABLE OR PARAMETER NAME ON BOTH SIDES OF AN EQUATION. BESIDES, PREPARETS OUTPUTS THE CORRECT DIMENSIONS


SEE COMPLETE ANSWER CLICK THE LINK

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What are some good alternatives to Simulink?

Matlabsolutions provide latest  MatLab Homework Help, MatLab Assignment Help  for students, engineers and researchers in Multiple Branches like ECE, EEE, CSE, Mechanical, Civil with 100% output.Matlab Code for B.E, B.Tech,M.E,M.Tech, Ph.D. Scholars with 100% privacy guaranteed. Get MATLAB projects with source code for your learning and research. SIMULINK is a visual programing environment specially for time transient simulations and ordinary differential equations. Depending on what you need there are plenty of Free, Libre and Open Source Software (FLOSS) available: Modelica language is the most viable alternative and in my opinion it is also a superior option to MathWorks SIMULINK. There are open source implementations  OpenModelica  and  JModelica . One of the main advantages with Modelica that you can code a multidimensional ordinary differential equation with algebraic discrete non-causal equations. With OpenModelica you may create a non-causal model right in the GUI and with
https://journals.worldnomads.com/scholarships/story/70330/Worldwide/Dat-shares-his-photos-from-Bhutan https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=441349916452722960&postID=9118208214656837886&page=2&token=1554200958385 https://todaysinspiration.blogspot.com/2016/08/lp-have-look-at-this-this-is-from.html?showComment=1554201056566#c578424769512920148 https://behaviorpsych.blogspot.com/p/goal-bank.html?showComment=1554201200695 https://billlumaye.blogspot.com/2012/10/tagg-romney-drops-by-bill-show.html?showComment=1550657710334#c7928008051819098612 http://blog.phdays.com/2014/07/review-of-waf-bypass-tasks.html?showComment=1554201301305#c6351671948289526101 http://www.readyshelby.org/blog/gifts-of-preparedness/#comment_form http://www.hanabilkova.svet-stranek.cz/nakup/ http://www.23hq.com/shailendrasingh/photo/21681053 http://blogs.stlawu.edu/jbpcultureandmedia/2013/11/18/blog-entry-10-guns-as-free-speech/comment-page-1443/#comment-198345 https://journals.worldnomads.com

USING MACHINE LEARNING CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHMS FOR DETECTING SPAM AND NON-SPAM EMAILS

    ABSTRACT We know the increasing volume of unwanted volume of emails as spam. As per statistical analysis 40% of all messages are spam which about 15.4 billion email for every day and that cost web clients about $355 million every year. Spammers to use a few dubious techniques to defeat the filtering strategies like utilizing irregular sender addresses or potentially add irregular characters to the start or the finish of the message subject line. A particular calculation is at that point used to take in the order rules from these email messages. Machine learning has been contemplated and there are loads of calculations can be used in email filtering. To classify these mails as spam and non-spam mails implementation of machine learning algorithm  such as KNN, SVM, Bayesian classification  and ANN  to develop better filtering tool.   Contents ABSTRACT 2 1. INTRODUCTION 4 1.1 Objective : 5 2. Literature Review 5 2.1. Existing Machine learning technique. 6 2.2 Existing