Skip to main content

Stretch the dynamic range of the given 8-bit grayscale image using MATL...

Antenna toolbox: Radiation pattern for linear array yields

 Antenna toolbox: Radiation pattern for linear array yields different results when same array is modeled as conformal

 

I have a simple 6 element array of z-oriented dipoles, where the array is aligned along the x axis. I modeled this array as either a linearArray or a conformalArray. Yet, when I compute the radiation pattern for the phi=90 plane (i.e. the y-z plane that cuts perpendicularly the array axis), I get vastly different results depending on whether I use linearArray or conformalArray. The unexpected result appears in Fig. 5 of the attached M file.
 
The strange thing is that intuition and running other functions (i.e. patternMultiply, arrayFactor) suggests that the pattern should be very low everywhere, due to the symmetry of the array. I even plotted the excitation currents on both arrays and they are practically identical (relative error < 1e-9) for linearArray vs conformalArray, so how can the radiation patterns be different? Is there some internal Matlab magic going on, is it a bug or is my understanding of arrays wrong?
 
I am using Antenna Toolbox 3.0 with R2017b

NOTE:-

Matlabsolutions.com provide latest MatLab Homework Help,MatLab Assignment Help for students, engineers and researchers in Multiple Branches like ECE, EEE, CSE, Mechanical, Civil with 100% output.Matlab Code for B.E, B.Tech,M.E,M.Tech, Ph.D. Scholars with 100% privacy guaranteed. Get MATLAB projects with source code for your learning and research.

By going through your code, I notice that you call the pattern function through: [F5,azi5,elv5]= pattern(la1,fd,90,-180:179);
 
However, antnena toolbox is in az/el system, not phi/theta. In order to correctly compute the pattern at phi = 90, theta = -180:180. you need to call pattern with the az/el value. [F5,azi5,elv5]= pattern(la1,fd,0,-180:179);
you can run the following updated code in your script, then you will get identical far field pattern result for the phi = 90 cut slice.
 
[F5,azi5,elv5]= pattern(la1,fd,-180:180,0);
[F6,azi6,elv6]= pattern(ca1,fd,-180:180,0);
figure; plot(azi5,F5); hold on; plot(azi6,F6,'r');
title('Elevation plot for phi=90'); legend('centered array','offset array');
set(gcf,'name','Coupling considered');axis tight;
 
In your orignial code, the cut slice is centered at origin, and not in main lobe, but close to one of the nulls. Also due to the offset of the two arrays, this cut is not the same place/element in the array, which lead to the difference in your code. if you plot the 3D full pattern of the array, you will find them are identical.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

https://journals.worldnomads.com/scholarships/story/70330/Worldwide/Dat-shares-his-photos-from-Bhutan https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=441349916452722960&postID=9118208214656837886&page=2&token=1554200958385 https://todaysinspiration.blogspot.com/2016/08/lp-have-look-at-this-this-is-from.html?showComment=1554201056566#c578424769512920148 https://behaviorpsych.blogspot.com/p/goal-bank.html?showComment=1554201200695 https://billlumaye.blogspot.com/2012/10/tagg-romney-drops-by-bill-show.html?showComment=1550657710334#c7928008051819098612 http://blog.phdays.com/2014/07/review-of-waf-bypass-tasks.html?showComment=1554201301305#c6351671948289526101 http://www.readyshelby.org/blog/gifts-of-preparedness/#comment_form http://www.hanabilkova.svet-stranek.cz/nakup/ http://www.23hq.com/shailendrasingh/photo/21681053 http://blogs.stlawu.edu/jbpcultureandmedia/2013/11/18/blog-entry-10-guns-as-free-speech/comment-page-1443/#comment-198345 https://journals.worldnomads.com

USING MACHINE LEARNING CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHMS FOR DETECTING SPAM AND NON-SPAM EMAILS

    ABSTRACT We know the increasing volume of unwanted volume of emails as spam. As per statistical analysis 40% of all messages are spam which about 15.4 billion email for every day and that cost web clients about $355 million every year. Spammers to use a few dubious techniques to defeat the filtering strategies like utilizing irregular sender addresses or potentially add irregular characters to the start or the finish of the message subject line. A particular calculation is at that point used to take in the order rules from these email messages. Machine learning has been contemplated and there are loads of calculations can be used in email filtering. To classify these mails as spam and non-spam mails implementation of machine learning algorithm  such as KNN, SVM, Bayesian classification  and ANN  to develop better filtering tool.   Contents ABSTRACT 2 1. INTRODUCTION 4 1.1 Objective : 5 2. Literature Review 5 2.1. Existing Machine learning technique. 6 2.2 Existing

Why are Fourier series important? Are there any real life applications of Fourier series?

A  Fourier series  is a way of representing a periodic function as a (possibly infinite) sum of sine and cosine functions. It is analogous to a Taylor series, which represents functions as possibly infinite sums of monomial terms. A sawtooth wave represented by a successively larger sum of trigonometric terms. For functions that are not periodic, the Fourier series is replaced by the Fourier transform. For functions of two variables that are periodic in both variables, the trigonometric basis in the Fourier series is replaced by the spherical harmonics. The Fourier series, as well as its generalizations, are essential throughout the physical sciences since the trigonometric functions are eigenfunctions of the Laplacian, which appears in many physical equations. Real-life applications: Signal Processing . It may be the best application of Fourier analysis. Approximation Theory . We use Fourier series to write a function as a trigonometric polynomial. Control Theory . The F